Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Analysis of Spatial Beam Structures: A Kinematic Decomposition Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32347/2410-2547.2026.116.439-449Keywords:
Spatial steel members, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN), Kinematic decomposition, Warping, Surrogate modeling, Coordinate scalingAbstract
The design of critical steel structures faces a persistent dilemma between computational speed and physical fidelity. While classical 1D beam elements are computationally efficient, they often fail to capture complex spatial effects like non-uniform torsion and cross-sectional distortion, whereas detailed 3D solid finite element models (FEM) offer reference accuracy but come at a prohibitive computational cost, making them unsuitable for real-time generative design or multi-objective optimization. This study proposes a novel Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) architecture designed to function as a real-time “AI-Surrogate” capable of predicting the stress-strain state of spatial members with the accuracy of a high-fidelity 3D FEM model but at analytical speeds. The proposed approach utilizes a Kinematic Decomposition strategy, separating the displacement field into a macroscopic “spine” behavior and a field of local cross-sectional deformations. This effectively reduces the dimensionality of the problem and allows for training on a compact dataset of 10,000 samples. To address the “linearization trap” and the vanishing gradient problem associated with predicting higher-order derivatives (curvature and bi-moments), we introduce a Coordinate Scaling technique. This method normalizes the derivative space, ensuring numerical stability and physical consistency of the solution. Validated against nonlinear 3D solid FEM simulations (Ansys), the model demonstrates high precision, achieving a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.08 mm for deflections and 0.2 mrad for torsion angles. Furthermore, the specialized physics-informed loss function successfully minimizes the curvature error to 1.510–4 m–2, ensuring the accurate recovery of internal forces. The results confirm that the proposed PINN architecture effectively bridges the gap between the speed of beam theories and the accuracy of volumetric models. The introduced Coordinate Scaling method proves critical for learning differential relationships in mechanics, paving the way for the next generation of real-time structural analysis tools.
References
D. Samadian, I. B. Muhit, and N. Dawood, “Application of Data-Driven Surrogate Models in Structural Engineering: A Literature Review,”Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 735–784, 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s11831-024-10152-0.
H.-T. Thai, “Machine learning for structural engineering: A state-of-the-art review,”Structures, vol. 38, pp. 448–491, 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003.
S. Getun, H. Ivanchenko, S. Botvinovska, G. Getun, and A. Solomin, “Optimization of structural computational models using neural networks: a systematic review of current approaches and prospects,”Applied Geometry and Engineering Graphics, vol. 108, pp. 72–96, 2025. DOI: 10.32347/0131-579X.2025.108.72-96.
Steel structures. Design standards, DBN V.2.6-198:2014, Ministry for Communities and Territories Development of Ukraine, Kyiv, 2022.
A. D. Jagtap and G. E. Karniadakis, “Extended physics-informed neural networks (XPINNs): A generalized space-time domain decomposition based deep learning framework for nonlinear partial differential equations,”Communications in Computational Physics, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 2002–2041, 2020. DOI: 10.4208/cicp.OA-2020-0164.
D. W. Abueidda, S. Koric, N. A. Sobh, and H. Sehitoglu, “Accelerating Multiscale Modeling with Hybrid Solvers: Coupling FEM and Neural Operators with Domain Decomposition,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11383, 2024. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.11383.
P. A. F. Enabe and R. Provasi, “A hybrid virtual element method and deep learning approach for solving one-dimensional Euler-Bernoulli beams,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.06925, 2025. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.06925.
H. Li, Y. Miao, Z. S. Khodaei, and M. H. Aliabadi, “Finite-PINN: A Physics-Informed Neural Network Architecture for Solving Solid Mechanics Problems with General Geometries,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09453, 2024. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.09453.
M. Yan, S. Deng, and H. You, “Initialization-enhanced physics-informed neural network with domain decomposition (IDPINN),”Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 530, 113914, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2025.113914.
K. Xie, Y. Huo, Z. Li, and Z. Wu, “ODE-DSN: A surrogate model for dynamic stiffness in microscopic RVE problems under nonuniform time-step strain inputs,”Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 49–60, 2025. DOI: 10.1093/jcde/qwaf012.
Z. Han, J. Ou, and K. Koyamada, “A Physics-informed neural network-based Surrogate Model for Analyzing Elasticity Problems in Plates with Holes,”Journal of Advanced Simulation in Science and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 2024. DOI: 10.15748/jasse.11.21.
H. Wu, Y.-C. Wu, P. Zhi, X. Wu, and T. Zhu, “Structural optimization of single-layer domes using surrogate-based physics-informed neural networks,”Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 10, e20867, 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20867.
L. Liang, M. Liu, C. Martin, and W. Sun, “A deep learning approach to estimate stress distribution: a fast and accurate surrogate of finite-element analysis,”Journal of The Royal Society Interface, vol. 15, no. 138, 20170844, 2018. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0844.
V. A. Bazhenov, O. S. Sakharov, O. I. Hulyar, S. O. Pyskunov, and Y. V. Maksymyuk, “Features of using the moment finite element scheme (MFES) in nonlinear calculations of shells and plates,”Strength of Materials and Theory of Structures, no. 92, pp. 3–16, 2014.
V. Yurchenko and I. D. Peleshko, “Searching for a compromise solution in cross-section size optimization problems of cold-formed steel structural members,”Strength of Materials and Theory of Structures, no. 109, pp. 72–92, 2022. DOI: 10.32347/2410-2547.2022.109.72-92.
H. Ivanchenko, G. Getun, I. Sklyarov, A. Solomin, and S. Getun, “Application of the low-rank adaptation method on the example of fine-tuning a latent diffusion model,”Strength of Materials and Theory of Structures, no. 114, pp. 299–310, 2025. DOI: 10.32347/2410-2547.2025.114.299-310.
H. Ivanchenko, G. Getun, I. Bezklubenko, A. Solomin, and S. Getun, “Mathematical model of the stress-strain state of multilayered structures with different elastic properties,”Strength of Materials and Theory of Structures, no. 113, pp. 131–138, 2024. DOI: 10.32347/2410-2547.2024.113.131-138.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.