Optimization of bidirectional data exchange processes between BIM-platforms and structural analysis software using visual programming tools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32347/2410-2547.2026.116.327-335Keywords:
BIM, visual programming, analytical model, design automation, Autodesk Revit, Dynamo, SCAD Office, FEMAbstract
The implementation and use of software focused on BIM technologies in the design activities of construction organizations require additional costs and a rather long transition period. In the absence of economic incentives and customers' interest in using BIM technologies, there is an impression of a lack of practical justification for their use by design organizations. However, there are a number of advantages underlying these technologies, consisting in the ability to create and operate a large database of a construction object, which in turn opens up the possibility of automating modeling processes. The paper considers approaches to automating modeling processes depending on the tools used.
The main focus of the work is on highlighting the possibilities of improving information exchange processes between software suites based on BIM technologies (Autodesk Revit) and computational software based on the finite element method (SCAD Office) using visual programming. This allows solving various types of tasks to accelerate and improve the quality of analytical models based on information models and creates opportunities for the computational software to provide feedback to the information model in the Revit environment. Two algorithms are presented, implemented by means of visual programming in the Dynamo environment. The first one allows to automatically supplement the original analytical model with foundation elements and adjust it if necessary to ensure its connectivity. The second one allows to automatically update the sections of metal structures based on information obtained in the SCAD Office environment.
References
Eastman C. M. The Use of Computers Instead of Drawings in Building Design // AIA Journal. 1975. Vol. 63. P. 46–50.
Nederveen G. A., Tolman F. P. Modelling Multiple Views on Buildings // Automation in Construction. 1992. Vol. 1. P. 215–224.
Azhar S. Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry // Leadership and Management in Engineering. 2011. Vol. 11, No. 3. P. 241–252.
Charef R., Alaka H., Emmitt S. Beyond the Third Dimension of BIM: A Systematic Review of Literature and Assessment of Professional Views // Journal of Building Engineering. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 242–257.
Bautiste P. Digital transformation in construction: Assessing BIM’s contribution to sustainable built environments // Results in Engineering. 2026. Vol. 29. 109694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.109694
Burgess M., Wilson C., Fan Y. V. Adoption drivers and barriers of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Europe // Energy and Buildings. 2026. Vol. 355. 116953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.116953
Yoo W., Clayton M. J. Neural network-enhanced BIM framework for designing thermally comfortable urban environments // Sustainable Cities and Society. 2026. Vol. 140. 107255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2026.107255
Ibba A., Alonso R., Recupero D. R. ASK-BIM: A knowledge graph-powered AI system for natural language querying of BIM models. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 2026. Vol. 164. 102581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2026.102581
Myers B. A. Visual programming, programming by example, and program visualization: A taxonomy // ACM SIGCHI Bulletin. 1986. Vol. 17, No. 4. P. 59–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/22339.22349
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.