The investigation of progressive collapse of steel structures considering physical nonlinearity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32347/2410-2547.2024.113.81-88Keywords:
physical nonlinearity, calculation, progressive collapse, sudden removal, quasi-static method, dynamic method, modeling, emergency loadsAbstract
The article comprehensively analyzes the problems of research into the phenomenon of progressive collapse, defines the current stage of research, identifies key issues during the simulation of sudden removal of structures, gives the results of the study of sudden collapse of steel structures without taking into account and taking into account physical nonlinearity.
A number of factors have been identified for the revival of interest in the topic of progressive collapse research, which began at the beginning of the new millennium and continues to this day. This includes the occurrence of world-famous cases of progressive collapse, a huge number of destroyed buildings and structures as a result of the full-scale invasion of the Russian Federation into Ukraine, a significant number of buildings and structures that, according to obvious signs, should have been completely destroyed due to the destruction of certain key load-bearing structures, but remained partially damaged, a low-income state regulatory framework regarding stability in the event of progressive collapse of buildings and structures, the emergence of technological possibilities for performing spatial calculations, etc.
An approximate list of factors has been defined, the consideration of which at the stage of numerical modeling of the emergency situation of a progressive collapse can increase the stability and reserve of the load-bearing capacity of structures. The current regulatory requirements for taking into account the physical nonlinearity of steel structures are analyzed. In addition, the parameters of physical nonlinearity modeling were evaluated, namely the selection of the "stress-strain" diagram, the selection of the deformation limit, etc.
Quasi-static and dynamic methods of modeling sudden collapse are compared, and the implementation algorithm of both methods is briefly analyzed. The scenarios according to which the simulation of the sudden collapse process took place are described.
References
R. Shankar Nair. Progressive Collapse Basics // Modern Steel Construction. - 2004.
VabishchevychM.O., FesunI.K. Pidkhody shchodo zabezpechennia stiikosti do prohresuiuchoho obvalennia budivel ta sporud. Suchasnyi stan ta perspektyvy (Approaches to ensuring resistance to the progressive collapse of buildings and structures. Current state and prospects)// Opir materialiv i teoriia sporud: nauk.-tekhn. zbirnyk. – K.: KNUBA, 2023. – Vyp. 110. – S. 256-263.
Vabishchevych M.O., Fesun I.K. Pro obstezhennia indyvidualnykh zhytlovykh budynkiv, shcho buly poshkodzheni ta zruinovani vnaslidok boiovykh dii. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system. Kyiv, 2023. № 53. S. 127 – 134, dx.doi.org10.32347/2412-9933.2023.53.127-134.
DBN V.1.2-14:2018. Systema zabezpechennia nadiinosti ta bezpeky budivelnykh obiektiv. Zahalni pryntsypy zabezpechennia nadiinosti ta konstruktyvnoi bezpeky budivel i sporud. Iz zminoiu No. 1 (The system for ensuring the reliability and safety of construction objects. General principles of ensuring the reliability and structural safety of buildings and structures. With Amendment No. 1). – K.: MinrehionbudUkrainy, 2018. – 36 s. – Chynnyi vid 01.01.2019.
DBN V.2.6-198:2014 Stalevi konstruktsii. Normy proektuvannia. Iz Zminoiu №1 (Steel structures. Design standards. With Amendment No. 1) – K.: MinrehionUkrainy, 2014. – 206 s. – Chynnyi vid 01.01.2015.
Barabash M. S. Pytannia oporu prohresuiuchomu ruinuvanniu nesuchykh system u PK Lira-SAPR // Stalyi rozvytok aviatsiinoi infrastruktury Ukrainy: kolektyvna monohrafiia. Lviv - Torun : Liha-Pres, 2023. — S. 301-316.
Zhang, Z.-J.; Chen, B.-S.; Bai, R.; Liu, Y.-P. Non-Linear Behavior and Design of Steel Structures: Review and Outlook. Buildings 2023, 13, 2111. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082111
EN1993-1-5; Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures. Part 1-5: Plated Structural Elements. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2006.
Kang, H.; Kim, J. Progressive collapse of steel moment frames subjected to vehicle impact. J. Perform. Construction Facil. 2015, 29, 04014172.
Janfada Iman S, Sheidaii Mohammad Reza, Kiakojouri Foad. Comparative analysis of code-based dynamic column removal and impact-induced progressive collapse in steel moment-resisting frames. Int J Steel Struct 2023;23:1576–86.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13296-023-00788-2.
DBN V.1.2-2:2006. Systema zabezpechennia nadiinosti ta bezpeky budivelnykh obiektiv. Navantazhennia i vplyvy. Normy proektuvannia iz zminamy №1 ta №2. (System for ensuring the reliability and safety of construction objects. Loads and influences. Design norms with changes No. 1 and No. 2.) K.: MinbudUkrainy, 2007.
DBN V.2.2-41:2019. Vysotni budivli. Osnovni polozhennia (High-rise buildings. Substantive provisions). – K.: MinrehionbudUkrainy, 2019. – 50 s. – Chynnyi vid 01.01.2020.
SCAD Office.Versyia 23.Vychislitelnyi kompleks SCAD++ / V.S. Karpylovskyi, Э.Z. Kryksunov, A.A. Maliarenko, A.V. Perelmuter, M.A. Perelmuter, S.Iu. Fyalko. — Yzdatelstvo «SKADSOFT» , 2024.— 992 str.
General Services Administration (GSA), (2013), Alternate path analysis and design guidelines for progressive collapse analysis, General Services Administration, Washington, DC.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
