Strength analysis in regulatory design documents and computational software




load-bearing capacity, building codes, computer analysis


Modern building design standards have a long history. During this time, they have undergone a number of changes, but some of their provisions and recommendations, once proclaimed, remain unchanged. And although they do not meet the modern possibilities of computational analysis, but continue to exist due to the established tradition. In this paper, attention is paid to only some of the mentioned conflicts, which are related to the software implementation of regulatory requirements. The first of them is connected with two different parts in the process of design justification: calculation of the stress-strain state and verification of the accepted cross sections. It is noted that when the calculation model adopted for computer analysis of the structure does not correspond to the model that was meant when compiling the regulatory document, there may be contradictions or inaccuracies that cannot be resolved without decoding the approach adopted in the standards. Unfortunately, such a decoding is not provided in our rationing system. Another group of conflicts is connected with conducting the structural analysis taking into account geometrical and physical nonlinearity declared by standards. The matter is there are some problems that cannot be solved when using nonlinear calculation, for instance, dynamic analysis using eigenmode decomposition with the subsequent summation of modal reactions. The problem of choosing an unfavorable combination of loads is also in this list. In the final part of the article some proposals are formulated. This proposals aimed at eliminating contradictions between the desire to develop simple and understandable design rules and the ability of modern computer to solve problems without the use of dubious simplifications.

Author Biography

Anatolii Perelmuter, LLC Research and Production Company SCAD Soft

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Chief Researcher of SCAD Soft


Bazhenov V.A., Perelmuter A.V., Shyshov O.V. Budivelna mekhanika. Kompiuterni tekhnolohii [Structural mechanics. Computer technology (in Ukrainian)] / ed. V.A.Bazhenov. — K.: Karavela, 2009. — 696 p.

Bazhenov V.A., Vabishchevych M.O., Vorona Yu.V., Pyskunov S.O., Perelmuter A.V., Solodei I.I. Kompiuterni tekhnolohii rozrakhunku prostorovykh konstruktsii pry statychnykh i dynamichnykh navantazhenniakh [Computer technologies for computation of spatial constructions under static and dynamic loadings (in Ukrainian)]. – K.: Karavela, 2018. – 312 p.

State Building Standards DBN В.1.1-12-2014. Budivnytstvo u seismichnykh raionakh Ukrainy [Construction on seismic region of Ukraine (in Ukrainian)]. K.: Ukrarkhbudinform, 2014. 109 p.

State Building Standards DBN B.2.6-98:2009. Betonni ta zalizobetonni konstruktsii. [Concrete and reinforsed concrete structures (in Ukrainian)], 2011. — 71 p.

State Standards of Ukraine DSTU В.2.6-156:2010. Betonni ta zalizobetonni konstruktsii z vazhkoho betonu. [Concrete and reinforsed concrete structures with heavy weight structural concrete (in Ukrainian)] – K.: Ukrarkhbudinform, 2011 – 117 p.

DBN В.2.6-198:2014. Stalevi konstruktsii. [Steel structures (in Ukrainian)] — K.: Ukrarkhbudinform, 2014. — 281 p.

Perelmuter A.V. O normatyvny`kh dokumentakh dlia stalny`kh konstruktsyi [On regulatory documents for steel structures (in Russian)] // Budivnytstvo i standartyzatsiia, 2000, № 1. — P. 6-10.

Perelmuter A.V., Slyvker V.Y. Povyshenie kachestva raschetnykh obosnovaniy proektov. Kto zhe, v kontse kontsov, otvechaet? [Improving the quality of design justifications for projects. Who, eventually, is responsible? (in Russian)] // Seysmostoykoye stroitelstvo. Bezopasnost sooruzheniy, VNYYNTPY, CD ROM, 2005.

Perelmuter A.V., Slyvker V.Y. Raschetnye modeli sooruzheniy i vozmozhnost ikh analiza [Design models of structures and the possibility of their analysis (in Russian)]. — 4-e izd., pererabotannoye i dopolnennoye. — M.: SKAD SOFT, 2020.— 736 p.

Perelmuter A.V., Tur V.V. Hotovy li my pereity k nelineinomu analizu pri proektirovanii? [Are we ready to move on to nonlinear analysis in design? (in Russian)] // International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering, 2017. Vol. 13, No 3. — C. 86-102.

Perelmuter A.V., Yurchenko V.V. Doslidzhennia oblasti nesuchoi zdatnosti tonkostinnykh sterzhnevykh elementiv iz kholodnohnutykh profiliv [Load-bearing capacity analysis of thin bar elements from cold rolled profiles (in Ukrainian)] // Nauka ta budivnytstvo, 2019, V. 21 № 3. — P. 42-48.

Perelmuter M.A., Popok K.V., Skoruk L.N. Raschet shyriny raskrytia normalnykh treshchyn po SP 63.13330.2012 [Calculation of the opening width of normal cracks according to Building Rules SP 63.13330.2012 (in Russian)] // Beton i zhelezobeton, 2014, № 1. P. 21-22.

Rabotnov Yu.N. Polzuchest elementov konstruktsiy [Creep of structural elements (in Russian)] — M.: Nauka, 1966. — 752 p.

Rzhanytsyn A.R. K voprosu o privedennykh dlinakh sterzhnei [On the question of buckling lengths of bars (in Russian)] // Stroitelnaya mekhanika i raschet sooruzheniy, 1975, №5. — P. 74-76.

Yasynskiy F.S. Izbrannye raboty po ustoichivosti szhatykh sterzhnei [Selected works on the stability of compressed bars (in Russian)]. — M.-L.: Gostekhyzdat,1952.

Gavrilenko I., Girenko S., Perelmuter A., Perelmuter M., Yurchenko V. Load-bearing capacity as an interactive analysis tool in SCAD Office // Proceding of the METNET Seminar 2017 in Cottbus. — Hämeelinna: HAMK, 2017 P. 112-127.